Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies for SR&MA

From: Effects of pubic hair grooming on women’s sexual health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

#

Author

Year of Publication

Study Design

Sample size, n

Country

Recruitment period/year

Participants

Exposure

Main findings

Commonest method of grooming

Complications of grooming e.g. (STI, Rash, Folliculitis …etc.)

Total

Groomer n (%)

Non-groomers n (%)

1

Toerein et al

2005

Cross-sectional study

678

581 (85.69)

97 (14.31)

UK

_

Female in any age groups who practiced PHR

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

Significant relationship was observed between younger age and PHR* practices

Shaving (not specified)

_

2

Tiggemann et al

2008

Cross-sectional study

235

194 (74.5)

41 (25.5)

Australia

_

Female of various socioeconomic background aged between 17 and 40 years whom were undergraduate

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

PHR* has different predictors than the removal of underarm or leg hair due to exposure to media

Shaving (not specified)

_

3

Herbenick et al

2010

Cross-sectional study

2451

1959 (79.9)

492 (20.1)

USA

2008

Women aged 18 to 68 years

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

Association between total PHR* with younger age, being partnered

Shaving (not specified)

Genital pain

4

Smolak et al

2011

Cross-sectional study

148

96 (65)

52 (35)

USA

_

Women aged above 18 years, undergraduate students

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

The relationships among normative, sexiness reasons and self-objectification

_

_

5

Bercaw-Pratt et al

2012

Cross-sectional study

171

120 (70.4)

51 (29.6)

USA

_

Adolescents and young women aged 12 to 20 years

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

PHR* was more common in sexually active participants

Shaving and waxing

_

6

Braun et al

2013

Cross-sectional study

50

47 (94)

3 (6)

New-Zealand

_

Women aged 18 to 48 years, from diverse ethnically; predominantly heterosexual

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

PHR* were not consistently gendered, With potential impacts on sexual and psychological well-being

_

_

7

Herbenick et al

2013

Cross-sectional study

2453

1410 (57.5)

1043 (42.5)

USA

2013

Women ages 18 to 68 years

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

Relation between PHR* and their sexual experiences on a day-to-day level with Clinical and educational impact

Non-electric blade razors with shaving cream

Genital pain and irritation

8

DeMariaa et al

2013

Cross-sectional study

1677

1533 (91.4)

144 (8.6)

USA

2010–2011

Women aged 16–40 years whom low-income Hispanic, Black, and White women

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

PHR* was common among white younger women of varying demographics with under or normal weight, and having 5 or more lifetime sexual partners

Non-electric blade razors and shaving cream

Folliculitis and ingrown hairs

9

DeMaria et al

2014

Cross-sectional study

333

333 (100)

0

USA

2012

Women aged 16 to 40 years

PHR* using

one or more depilatory

methods

Minor complications commonly occur as a consequence of PHR* and the findings supported the idea of visiting physician to receive health advice on PHR* particularly obese women

Non-electric blade razors

Epidermal abrasions, cuts, bumps, rashes, ingrown hairs, Severe itching and Infection

10

Butler et al

2015

Cross-sectional study

671

644 (96)

27 (4)

USA

_

College women aged above 18 years

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

Genital grooming and PHR* are common practices among women of college-age. Stronger associations with feelings of cleanliness, comfort, sex appeal, social norms and affordability

Shaving (non-specified)

Genital pain, rash, Itching, cuts

11

Stone et al

2016

Cross-sectional study

126

126 (83.4)

25 (16.6)

_

2015

Women aged above 18 years

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

Association between PHR* with women being younger, White and were more satisfied with their genitals

_

_

12

Rowen et al

2016

Cross-sectional study

3316

2778 (83.8)

538 (16.2)

USA

2013–2015

Women aged 18 to 65 years

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

There were demographic differences in grooming practice, which may reflect cultural variations in preference, also no association between grooming, income and relationship status

Non-electric blade razors

_

13

Demaria et al

2016

Cross-sectional study

663

642 (96.8)

21 (3.2)

USA

2013

Young women aged 18–24 years

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

Education regarding safe PHR* methods is needed, especially for those who initiate pubic hair removal and sexual behaviors concurrently

Non-electric blade razors

Burn, In-grown hairs, severe itching, cuts, rash

14

Sangiorgi et al

2017

Cross-sectional study

52,787

51,386 (97.34)

14,01 (2.65)

Brazil

2015

Women aged above 18 years

PHR* using

one or more depilatory

methods

Most Brazilian younger women prefer the complete PHR*, especially sexually active women with a stronger preference for complete PHR

Hot wax

_

15

Truesdale et al

2017

Cross-sectional study

3372

3204 (85.3)

168 (14.7)

USA

2014–2017

Women aged 18 to 65 years

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

Grooming frequency and degree of grooming are independent risk factors for injury

Non-electric blade razors

Lacerations (most common minor injury) serious injuries rare

16

Rouzi et al

2018

Cross-sectional study

400

400 (100)

0

Saudi Arabia

2015–2016

Women aged 16 to 60 years

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

PHR* common in Saudi women who initiate PHR in early adolescence

Non-electric blade razors

Cuts, bruise, abrasion, severe itching, ingrown hair, rash, burn, allergy, hyperpigmentation

17

Luster et al

2019

Cross-sectional study

214

209 (98.1)

5 (2)

USA

2017–2018

Female university students, at least 18 years of age

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

PHR* was common among female university students but the findings do not support it as an STI risk factor in this population

Non-electric blade razors

STI (Gonorrhea/chlamydia)

18

obst et al

2019

Cross-sectional study

270

220 (81.6)

50 (18.3)

Australia

2019

Young adult women aged 17 to 25 years

PHR* using

one or more depilatory

methods

Association between social image and young women decision to engage in behavior that associated with their body image

Shaving (not specified)

_

19

Enzlin et al

2019

Cross-sectional study

1735

1683 (97)

52 (3.1)

Belgium

2011

Women aged 15 to 60 years, they self-identified as heterosexual, bisexual, or homosexual

PHR* using

one or more depilatory

methods

PHR* is a widespread practice with strongly association with personal, partner-related, sexual, and relational factors

_

Skin rash, itching, bumps

20

Gaither et al

2020

Cross-sectional study

58

54 (93)

4 (7)

USA

2018

Women aged above 18 years received STI testing in the study period, sexually active within the past 3 months

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

No association between recent grooming and genital STIs

All methods used with no specification

_

21

Beksinska et al

2020

Cross-sectional study

1211

705 (58.2)

506 (41.8)

South Africa

2017–2018

Women aged 16 to 35 years. All were tested for STIs

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

The practice of PHR* is common among in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa population with association of high reporting of side effects as injuries.These injuries could put women at a higher risk of STIs

Non-electric blade razors

Itching, pimples, blisters, rash, bleeding, burns and STI (STI (C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhea or HSV2)

22

DeMaria et al

2021

Cross-sectional study

46

46 (100)

0

Italy

2017

Women aged 18 to 45 years

PHR* using one or more depilatory methods

Women engaging in more frequent and earlier waxing PHR* with early onset during adolescence, often upon puberty which influenced by Sexual partners, cultural norms and the desire for cleanliness

Waxing

Burning pain, cuts, ingrown hairs, scarring, swelling, bruising

  1. * abbreviation for Pubic Hair Removal