Correlates of cervical cancer screening participation, intention and self-efficacy among Muslim women in southern Ghana

Table 5 Binary logistic regression on correlates of engagement in cervical cancer screening, self-efficacy about cervical cancer screening and intention to engage in cervical cancer screening

Variables	Participated in CCS (n = 431)			CCS self-efficacy (n = 431)			CCS intention (n = 410)
Variables	B (S.E.)	aOR	95% CI	B (S.E.)	aOR	95% CI	B (S.E.)	aOR	95% CI
Demographics
Monthly income^a
Average	1.77 (0.87)*	5.87	1.07–32.27	0.01 (0.37)	1.01	0.49–2.10	0.15 (0.42)	1.16	0.51–2.63
Above-average	2.07 (0.90)*	7.95	1.36–46.28	− 0.41 (0.38)	0.66	0.32–1.39	− 0.38 (0.43)	0.68	0.29–1.59
Education level^a
Secondary	1.02 (0.71)	2.76	0.68–11.20	− 0.16 (0.38)	0.85	0.40–1.81	0.76 (0.47)	2.13	0.85–5.38
Degree	− 0.64 (0.86)	0.53	0.99–2.83	− 0.47 (0.42)	0.62	0.28–1.41	0.45 (0.47)	1.56	0.62–3.95
Religion factors
Modesty	0.22 (0.07)	1.24	1.07–1.43	− 0.13 (0.04)***	0.88	0.81–0.96	− 0.13 (0.05)***	0.88	0.80–0.97
Faith	0.01 (0.13)	1.01	0.79–1.29	− 0.00 (0.79)	0.99	0.86 –1.17	− 0.05 (0.09)	1.05	0.88–1.26
Provider-related
Self-sampling	0.18 (0.78)	1.20	0.26–5.52	− 0.24 (0.42)	0.79	0.35–1.79	− 0.92 (0.50)	0.40	0.15–1.06
Similarity	0.11 (0.17)	1.11	0.80–1.55	− 0.21 (0.10)*	0.81	0.67–0.99	− 0.18 (0.11)	0.84	0.67–1.04
TPB variables
Knowledge	0.28 (0.09)**	1.32	1.11–1.56	0.06 (0.05)	1.06	0.97–1.17	− 0.03 (0.05)	0.97	0.88–1.08
Attitudes	0.24 (0.14)	1.28	0.98–1.67	0.28 (0.08)***	1.32	1.14–1.53	0.35 (0.09)***	1.42	1.20–1.68
Subjective Norms	− 0.10 (0.08)	0.91	0.77–1.06	− 0.02 (0.05)	0.98	0.89–1.07	0.00 (0.06)	1.00	0.90–1.11
Behavioural Control	0.07 (0.12)	1.07	0.85–1.36	0.03 (0.06)	1.03	0.92–1.16	0.09 (0.06)	1.10	0.97–1.24

TPB Theory of planned behaviour, aOR Adjusted odds ratio, CCS Cervical cancer screening, CI Confidence interval
^aReference group (monthly income = below-average; education level = up to primary education)
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

ISSN: 1472-6874