Skip to main content

Table 8 Social support after stillbirth descriptive statistics at ego level

From: The role and attributes of social networks in the provision of support to women after stillbirth: experiences from Uganda

Variable

Category

KR001

N (%)

NF004

N (%)

NH005

N (%)

NE007

N (%)

NK008

N (%)

NJ009

N (%)

Count on alter for support

Not at all

4 (20)

8 (40)

8 (40)

5 (25)

6 (30)

7 (35)

A little bit

8 (40)

6 (30)

11 (55)

10 (50)

12 (60)

10 (50)

Very much

8 (40)

6 (30)

1 (5)

5 (25)

2 (10)

3 (15)

Type of social support

Material (yes)

9 (45)

8 (40)

6 (30)

17 (85)

14 (70)

2 (10)

Financial (yes)

4 (20)

9 (45)

8 (40)

18 (90)

17 (85)

3 (15)

Emotional (yes)

17 (85)

19 (95)

20 (100)

20 (100)

19 (95)

20 (100)

Instrumental (yes)

10 (50)

9 (45)

9 (45)

18 (90)

13 (65)

6 (30)

Information (yes)

17 (85)

20 (100)

14 (70)

17 (85)

15 (75)

9 (45)

Frequency of contact

About every day

9 (45)

2 (10)

4 (20)

6 (30)

3 (15)

6 (30)

Once a week

3 (15)

13 (65)

8 (40)

6 (30)

11 (55)

4 (20)

Once a month

4 (20)

3 (15)

7 (35)

7 (35)

4 (20)

5 (25)

Once in 3 months

2 (10)

2 (10)

1 (5)

1 (5)

1 (5)

5 (25)

Once in 6 months

2 (10)

–

–

–

1 (5)

–

Emotional closeness

Not at all

6 (30)

2 (10)

10 (50)

5 (25)

6 (30)

4 (20)

Somewhat close

7 (35)

11 (55)

8 (40)

9 (45)

12 (60)

11 (55)

Very close

7 (35)

7 (35)

2 (10)

6 (30)

2 (10)

5 (25)

How alter got to know about stillbirth news

Told them myself

8 (40)

9 (45)

5 (25)

3 (15)

3 (15)

4 (20)

Knew by themselves

2 (10)

1 (5)

2 (10)

1 (5)

6 (30)

6 (30)

Through network members

7 (35)

10 (50)

13 (65)

16 (80)

11 (55)

10 (50)

Other means

3 (15)

–

–

–

–

–

Change in friendship after stillbirth

As before

11 (55)

11 (55)

11 (55)

7 (35)

13 (65)

18 (90)

Better now

8 (40)

9 (45)

8 (40)

13 (65)

7 (35)

2 (10)

Worse than before

1 (5)

–

1 (5)

–

–

–