Table 3 Logistic regression odds of using LAPMs among women (15–49) in Siaya and Busia counties, Kenya
Explanatory variables | Model 0 | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
25–39 | 1.53*** | 1.48, 1.59 | 0.96 | 0.87, 1.06 | 1.02 | 0.92, 1.13 |
40+ | 1.55*** | 1.38, 1.75 | 0.66*** | 0.53, 0.83 | 0.67** | 0.53, 0.85 |
Number of children (Ref: None) | ||||||
1–2 | 4.24*** | 3.95, 4.55 | 5.22*** | 4.64, 5.87 | 5.06*** | 4.43, 5.79 |
3–4 | 7.30*** | 6.69, 7.96 | 7.02*** | 6.13, 8.03 | 6.16*** | 5.28, 7.19 |
5+ | 9.29*** | 8.31, 10.37 | 7.44*** | 6.29, 8.79 | 5.80*** | 4.81, 6.99 |
Level of education (Ref: None) | ||||||
Primary incomplete | 6.71*** | 6.23, 7.22 | 0.51*** | 0.43, 0.59 | 0.64*** | 0.53, 0.77 |
Primary complete | 3.22*** | 3.02, 3.43 | 0.36*** | 0.31, 0.42 | 0.45*** | 0.37, 0.54 |
Secondary+ | 1.25*** | 1.17, 1.34 | 0.21*** | 0.18, 0.24 | 0.25*** | 0.21, 0.31 |
County (Ref: Siaya) | ||||||
Busia | 5.96*** | 5.62, 6.31 | 3.77*** | 3.36, 4.24 | 3.63*** | 3.22, 4.09 |
FP service delivery model (Ref: Facility-based) | ||||||
Mobile service | 3.77*** | 3.63, 3.92 | 2.55*** | 2.29, 2.84 | 2.50*** | 2.23, 2.79 |
Project status (Ref: New FP user and project beneficiary) | ||||||
Existing FP user and new project beneficiary | 2.04*** | 1.93, 2.15 | 0.72 | 0.64, 0.80 | 0.73*** | 0.65, 0.82 |
Existing FP user and project beneficiary | 0.98 | 0.94, 1.02 | 0.38 | 0.34, 0.43 | 0.40*** | 0.35, 0.45 |
2014 | 1.40*** | 1.36, 1.44 | 1.43 | 1.26, 1.62 | 1.61*** | 1.41, 1.84 |
2015 | 1.02 | 0.97, 1.07 | 0.55 | 0.48, 0.64 | 0.65*** | 0.56, 0.76 |
Fertility intentions (Ref: Wants no more children) | ||||||
Wants another child within 2 years | 1.14 | 1.06, 1.24 | 0.30*** | 0.24, 0.36 | ||
Wants another child after 2 years | 4.80 | 4.57, 5.05 | 0.78** | 0.66, 0.92 | ||
Missing/Non-numeric response | 0.50 | 0.49, 0.52 | 0.62*** | 0.51, 0.77 | ||
Received counseling on (Ref: No) | ||||||
Yes | 1.39 | 1.36, 1.43 | 1.15 | 0.91, 1.46 | ||